<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: maybe a new callsign soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w7cf.net/2008/01/12/maybe-a-new-callsign-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w7cf.net/2008/01/12/maybe-a-new-callsign-soon/</link>
	<description>Adventures and QSN of a new ham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul NG7Z</title>
		<link>http://w7cf.net/2008/01/12/maybe-a-new-callsign-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul NG7Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w7cf.net/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
Paul NG7Z here. I like all the calls you&#039;re applying for. Each one is snappy on CW but the two that end with a Z can be confusing on the other end. I know that from experience. W7CF is probably the best on CW. Each character is distinct and not confusing in bad QRM on a crowded band with lots of loud signals.
73 Paul NG7Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
Paul NG7Z here. I like all the calls you&#8217;re applying for. Each one is snappy on CW but the two that end with a Z can be confusing on the other end. I know that from experience. W7CF is probably the best on CW. Each character is distinct and not confusing in bad QRM on a crowded band with lots of loud signals.<br />
73 Paul NG7Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

